Abstract
The experiments were carried out at the farm of Bangladesh Rice Research Institute,
Gazipur during 2000-2002 to find out the effect of N and weed management practices on
the growth and yield of direct seeded Aman and Boro rice compared to transplanted
method and their economic profitability. The treatments were assigned in a split-plot
design with planting methods in the main plot and combination of N and weed
management in the sub-plot. The results indicated that there was herbicide toxicity, which
was recovered after 21 days of herbicide application. Although higher tiller number was
observed with broadcast (BC) at vegetative stage, the difference was insignificant for
panicle production. Significantly higher dry matter (DM) production was found in
transplanting (TP) than BC, especially in Boro season. Similar pattern followed for crop
growth rate (CGR) and leaf area index (LAI). In most cases, 2 hand weeding (HW) and
Ronstar + 1 HW helped in producing more number of tillers than Ronstar alone in Boro
season. The BC and TP methods gave similar grain yields. There was no such variation in
grain yield due to N management, although 4 to 7% higher grain yield was recorded with
LCC based N management than 3 splits with or without basal N application. About 12% N
could be saved with LCC based N management in Aman season without decreasing grain
yield. Weed density and weed dry weight were higher in Boro than in Aman season.
Nitrogen application and its management did not affect weed DM production in most
cases. TP method had significantly higher N uptake than BC in Boro season. Significantly
higher N uptake was found in 2HW and Ronstar + 1 HW compared to Ronstar alone. Crop
establishment methods did not significantly influence the various indices of N utilization
efficiency both in Boro and Aman seasons. In BC method, there was significantly higher N
uptake by weeds than in TP method in different seasons. Effects of interaction of different
parameters like tiller number, DM, CGR and LAI were significant. Production cost was
higher in TP method than in BC method. The gross margin was higher in TP than in
direct-seeded rice. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) of BC method was higher compared to
other planting methods. The LCC based N management alongwith weed control by
Ronstar alone or Ronstar + 1 HW had higher BCR in both the seasons. The basal N plus
LCC based N management alongwith weed control by Ronstar supplemented with 1 HW
would increase grain yield of direct-wet seeded rice.