Institutional Repository
Thesis Issued 2026-09-06 EN

Genetic Diversity in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) and Detection of Biomolecular Markers Along with Their Protective Roles Against Water Stress

Author: Md. Rezwan Molla

Abstract

A total of 96 winter and 10 summer growing chilli (Capsicum annuиm L.) genotypes of Bangladesh were studied to identify diversity in sensitivity to drought and waterlogging with their bio-molecular markers involved in tolerant mechanism during October, 2016 to December, 2019. In this study, 39 and 8 SSR markers were used to characterize 96 winter and 10 summer chilli genotypes, respectively. Аll microsatellite markers were found to be polymorphic, revealing a total of 123 and 30 alleles with an average 3.154 and 3.750 alleles in analysis of 96 and 10 chilli genotypes, respectively. Variability also found in Nei's (1973) еxреcted heterozygosity, Gene flow estimated, Genetic differentiation and Shannon's Information Index. According to PIC values 12 out of 39 and 6 out of 8 markers were very informative with higher PIC values (>0.6). Higher PIC values might be the result of diverse genotypes. All of winter and summer chilli genotypes in this study showed unique and differential DNA banding patterns across at least one and/or combination of two to five primers. The genotypes had distinct status in the dendrogram, because there might have effect of different genetic distance (GD) which might be designated through morphological traits and geographical sources. According to Nei's (1972) genetic distance, higher values (>0.6) generated in participation of 55 among 96 winter genotypes, while all of 10 summer chilli genotypes exhibited higher GD (>0.6) values. Hence, morphological characterization was determined in these diverse 55 winter and 10 summer chilli genotypes. Thirty qualitative characters were recorded to study on morphological traits. According to diversity index, 15 and 11 out of 30 characters showed high phenotypic diversity (H≥0.75) in winter and summer chilli genotypes, respectively. Many genotypes were found distinct morphologically from others due to different traits and their combination. Variation in phenotypic characters separated the genotypes in different clusters of the dendrogram. Dendrogram showed that eight winter chilli genotypes closely related with other genotype in respective cluster. Hence, 47 among 55 genotypes were selected for further study. On the other hand, all of 10 summer chilli genotypes were selected for further study due to their different cluster position with distinct phenotypic variation. Overall, a relationship between genotypic and phenotypic markers was determined. Forty seven winter genotypes were evaluated for their genetic potential to drought tolerant at germination stage using 12.5% polyethylene glycol (PEG, 6000). Based on aggregated score of RGE, RGR, RGI and RVI parameters top 10 genotypes on ranking position were selected as tolerant. While, lowermost 10 genotypes in the rank of drought tolerant 38-47 position were selected as susceptible to drought stress. In dedrogram, tolerant genotypes grouped in cluster I. RGI showed comparatively strong and positive correlation with all tested parameters. Hence, these 20 genotypes were used to further screening of drought tolerance performance at seedling stage. Besides, seedling of 10 diverse summer chilli genotypes was evaluated to find out their tolerance performance under waterlogging. Based on their survival performance under deficit water stress, two genotypes viz., BD-10906 and BD-10912 were selected as tolerant and the genotypes BD-10902 and RT-20 as susceptible to drought stress. Similarly, two genotypes viz., SRC-517 and BARI morich-2 was selected as tolerant while AHM-206 and RI-1(6) as susceptible to waterlogging stress. Distinct phenotypic difference was observed between tolerant and susceptible genotypes in stress and recovery condition. Growth and chlorophyll (Chl a, Chl b and Chl a+b) were also inhibited in both tolerant and susceptible under both stress, but the inhibition was high in susceptible genotypes. Higher carotenoid in stress induced tolerant genotypes play important role in reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) like 102 as well as beta-oxidation. Relative water content and better osmotic adjustment maintained by accumulating more osmolytes, were mainly responsible to make tolerant genotypes. Stomatal limitation occurred in tolerant genotypes to maintain leaf water potential and relative water content. The formation of aerenchyma cells in tolerant genotypes under flooding conditions can be considered as tolerance mechanism for long-term survival. Both drought and waterlogging stress caused oxidative stress in chilli seedlings through lipid peroxidation, loss of plasma membrane integrity, higher ROS and methylglyoxal (MG) formation. ROS like O2*- and H2O2 were significantly higher in that susceptible genotypes. Higher ascorbate and glutathione redox system also help tolerant genotypes by scavenging overproduced ROS under water stresses. However, antioxidant defense especially superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase and non-chloroplatic peroxidase (POD) was found significantly higher in tolerant genotypes, which play one of the most important role for scavenging oxidative stress. In gel activity, SOD2 and SOD3 play important roles to defense in O2- mediated oxidative damage. Similarly, POD1 can be important for ROS metabolism in recovery as well as to provide higher specific activity. Activity of other antioxidant like ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, dehydroascorbate reductase and monodehydroascorbate reductase was also higher in tolerant genotypes. Higher glyoxalase I and glyoxalase II activities in tolerant genotypes help to convert the potential MG to non-toxic hydroxiacids