Institutional Repository
Thesis Issued 2026-09-08 EN

Studies on culture, life cycle and survival of rice stem nematode, Ditylenchus angustus (Butler, 1913) Filipjev, 1936

Author: Muhammad Abu Bakr
Plant Pathology

Abstract

The rice stem nematode Ditylenchus angustus(Butler, 1913) Filipjev, 1936., was successfully cultured on Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. growing on autoclaved rice grains, but failed to grow on excised pieces of rice stems, leafsheaths, boots, carrot slices, and potato slices. The growth of nematode was poor on the other six fungi used for its cultivation. The cultured nematodes were similar to the nematodes isolated from ufra infected rice plants in terms of morphology and infectivity to rice plants. Its life cycle from egg to egg was completed in 11-15 days in rice plants and 11-17 days in fungal culture. The five growth stages of the nematode are described. Based on direct observations on the molting larvae, the body length ranges of the three larval groups were determined. The nematode is amphimictic, failing to reproduce parthenogenetically on rice plants. In a glasshouse pot experiment, the number of generations was six in transplanted Aman and eight on deepwater Aman rice. The nematode survived 14-22 days in water at the ambient temperature, but more than 40 days in cold water at 6°C. In water, the lethal high temperature for the nematode was 43° for six hours, while it survived only 30 minutes at chilling temperature. Higher concentrations of sodium chloride (1.20%) was toxic to the nematode in vitro, but rice plants grown in 0.5% saline soil (ECe 11.6 ds/m) were susceptible to the disease. The nematode entered rice grains but did not survive more than a month in dried seeds with moisture content below 14%. Rice field straw and stubble were the most potential sources of nematode survival. Low temperature (6°C) and moist condition prolonged cryptobiotic survival of the nematodes in rice straw compared to higher temperature (30°C) and continuous dry condition. Forty percent of rice stubble in the field harboured viable nematodes even five months after harvest. Nematode survival in dry or moist soil was found unlikely.