Institutional Repository
Thesis Issued 2026-09-09 EN

Studies of Genotype-Environment Interaction in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)

Author: Mohd. Moslemuddin

Abstract

Genotype-envirenment interaction of some agrenomical characters including yield of eight inbred lines and seme segregating generations of rice (Oryza sativa L.) was studied. The inbred lines censisted of three local and five exotic varieties such as Naizersail, Badshabhog, Kataribhog, Chinese, IR-8, IR-532, IR-20 and IR-5 and F₂ generations of five crosses made between tall and dwarf varieties were Chinese x Kataribhog, IR-8 X Chinese, IR-20 X Kataribhog, Chinese X Naizersail and IR-8 X Kataribhog. The inbred lines under different eight were growm eight nutritional treatments of presence and absence of N, P and K fertilizersin pots during 1977 for season I and during 1978 for season II. Each experiment had three replications consisting two pots per variety and per dose of nutritional treatment under each replication and they were randomly arranged under direct sunlight. Five F₂ families and their five parents were also grown in 1978 under the same eight nutritional treatments having six replications for each treatment. Due to the unavailability of data on yield and yield components for the three local varieties during season II, the data were grouped into the following four categories for analysis. A. Yield and yield components of eight parental lines for season I. B. Yield and yield components and some morphological and developmental characters of five parental lines for seasons 1 and II. C. Morphological and developmental characters of eight parental lines for seasons I and II. D. Yield and yield components of five F₂s and their five parents. The data were collected on length of panicle, primary branches/ panicle, spikelet number/panicle, kernel number/panicle, 100 kernel weight, yield/plant, tiller number, fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, fresh roof weight, dry roof weight and plant height. The data were then analysed following the techniques equivalent to those developed by Yates and Cochran (1938), Mather and Jones (1958), Finlay and Wilkinson (1963), Eberhart and Russell (1966), Bucio Alanis (1966), Bucio Alanis and Hill (1966), Perkins and Jinks(1968a), Bucio Alanis et. al. (1969) and Breese (1969). Genotype-environment interactions were found to operate in both parental lines and F₂ families. Greater portion of G X E interactioeffects was accounted by the linear function of the environmental mean, although a significant part of the G X E effects was non-linear in nature. Both the linear and non-linear components of 0 X E effects were under the. control of different gene systens. A great genetic diversity was observed in genotypes investigated. As regards the effects of individual nutrition, N had the largest single effect on most of the characters. N, P and NP significantly increased the yield performances for all the varieties and the F₂s. Amont the F₂8 IR-8 X Kataribhog gave the highest yield performances. K had no effect on yield. High and low genotypic as well as environmental variations were found in the characters investigated The genotypes had varied responses to different environments. F₂ families were more responsive to the environments than those of their parental lines. The standard error of the responses were heterogenous indicating varied stability among the genotypes. 2 families differed from their parents with respect to the stability within an environment but the stability values varied in different characters and crosses. Association of mean (✗), responses (b) and stability (2) was present in some characters and absent in others. When they ( bi as well as ) were examined between characters, they were found to be associated in some combinations while in other combinations no association was noted. Significant dominant and additive effects were indicated in controlling the mean expression of these characters studied. Both dominant and additive components of varistion interacted with the environment but they were of different function of the environmental means and were under different gene systems. Potence ratios were high in poor environments and low in good environments in some characters and in others the reverse was true.